Each of these three groups are unique in their stages of development; therefore, each must be taught quite differently. The HBLT approach may be used to teach all three age groups, however, it must be tailored to fit the developmental pattern of the students involved.
Of youth, children, and preschoolers, with which group do you have the most experience teaching? How have you altered the HBLT approach to fit the age group you teach the most?
Monday, April 20, 2009
Monday, April 13, 2009
Monday, April 6, 2009
A Great Teacher
One of the main things my husband, Bryan, and I have in common is our love of teaching. We both absolutely love to teach! However, that's where the similiarities between our common profession end.
I am a devoted planner--when structuring a lesson, I have to write everything out, make a checklist, and go strictly by it. Bryan, on the other hand, makes plans, but only in his head. With the exception of his sermons, he never writes out how he's going to teach a lesson, and his best illustrations come to him "on the fly"--so to speak--rather than from research. I sometimes have a hard time filling up an entire hour when teaching a lesson, whereas Bryan could teach for three hours straight without stopping and keep on going. Because of my shy nature, it's often difficult for me to initially warm up to my students; it takes longer for me to develop a deep relationship with them. Bryan, however, has never met a stranger and forms immediate trusting relationships with his students. While most attempts on my part at humor in the classroom fall flat, Bryan has his students roaring with laughter at every quip.
Although I profoundly admire my husband's engaging teaching style, I must admit that at times I am a bit jealous. Teaching seems to come so easy for him! Observing Bryan, however, helps me to continue to stretch to be a better teacher myself.
I am a devoted planner--when structuring a lesson, I have to write everything out, make a checklist, and go strictly by it. Bryan, on the other hand, makes plans, but only in his head. With the exception of his sermons, he never writes out how he's going to teach a lesson, and his best illustrations come to him "on the fly"--so to speak--rather than from research. I sometimes have a hard time filling up an entire hour when teaching a lesson, whereas Bryan could teach for three hours straight without stopping and keep on going. Because of my shy nature, it's often difficult for me to initially warm up to my students; it takes longer for me to develop a deep relationship with them. Bryan, however, has never met a stranger and forms immediate trusting relationships with his students. While most attempts on my part at humor in the classroom fall flat, Bryan has his students roaring with laughter at every quip.
Although I profoundly admire my husband's engaging teaching style, I must admit that at times I am a bit jealous. Teaching seems to come so easy for him! Observing Bryan, however, helps me to continue to stretch to be a better teacher myself.
Monday, March 30, 2009
Pros & Cons of Published Curriculum
In your opinion, what are the pros and cons of using a published curriculum?
Wednesday, March 25, 2009
The Importance of Application
It’s difficult to motivate students to examine their own lives and make personal application of Biblical truths. We as humans are too prideful to recognize sin in our own lives; it’s much easier to point out sin in the lives of others. Jesus spoke pointedly regarding our hypocritical nature in Matthew 7:3: “And why do you look at the speck in your brother’s eye, but do not consider the plank in your own eye?”
Considering our tendency to ignore our own sin while eagerly pointing out the sin of others, as teachers of the Word we must seek to guide our students to personal application all the more. To teach strictly Scripture without applying it leads to only gaining head knowledge, not true change in the believer.
Considering our tendency to ignore our own sin while eagerly pointing out the sin of others, as teachers of the Word we must seek to guide our students to personal application all the more. To teach strictly Scripture without applying it leads to only gaining head knowledge, not true change in the believer.
Tuesday, March 17, 2009
HBLT Approach
What do you believe are the strengths of the HBLT approach? How would you modify it to better fit your teaching style or needs?
Wednesday, March 4, 2009
Bloom's & the Holy Spirit
I thought the author's explanation of Bloom's Three Domains of Learning in conjunction with Acts 2:37 was excellent. We not only want our students to have "head knowledge" of the Word, but we also want them to be "cut" by the Word in their emotions so that they will be spurned to "do" the Word.
As stated in the text, we cannot, however, play the role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of our students. Often teachers--through their own selfish efforts--will try to "push" their students into confessions of faith or commitment to change or service. Our job is not to force our students into being Christlike; rather, our work is done through diligent prayer to God, study of His Word, and planning for the lessons we are to teach. We must end our job there and let the Holy Spirit do His own work.
As stated in the text, we cannot, however, play the role of the Holy Spirit in the lives of our students. Often teachers--through their own selfish efforts--will try to "push" their students into confessions of faith or commitment to change or service. Our job is not to force our students into being Christlike; rather, our work is done through diligent prayer to God, study of His Word, and planning for the lessons we are to teach. We must end our job there and let the Holy Spirit do His own work.
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)